The Revolution – Marriage & Maternity TEXT

PDF Text Thanks to Lewis and Clark Digital Collections

Marriage and Maternity

The Revolution Vol 4 No 1 p. 4

New York Thursday July 8 1869

Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Editor

Susan B. Anthony, Proprietor

In a late REVOLUTION is an extract from the New York Medical Gazette rebuking a practice common among married women, and demanding a law for its suppression.

Much as I deplore the horrible crime of child-murder, earnestly as I desire its suppression, I cannot believe with the writer of the above-mentioned article, that such a law would have the desired effect. It seems to me to be only mowing off the top of the noxious weed, while the root remains.

We want prevention, nor merely punishment. We must reach the root of the evil, and destroy it.

To my certain knowledge, this crime is not confined to those whose love of ease, amusement and fashionable life leads them to desire immunity from the cares of children; but is practiced by those whose inmost souls revolt from the dreadful deed, and in whose hearts the maternal feeling is pure and undying. What then, has driven these women to the desperation necessary to force them to commit such a deed? This question being answered, I believe we shall have such an insight in to the matter as to be able to talk more clearly of a remedy.

Women are educated to think that with marriage their individuality ceases or is transferred to their husbands. The wife has thenceforth no right over hew own body. This is also the husband’s belief, and upon which he acts. No matter what her condition, physical or mental, no matter how ill-prepared she may feel herself for maternity, the demands of his passion must not be refused.

He thinks, or cares nothing, for the possible result of his gratification. If it be that an immortal being, with all its needs, physical, mental and moral, shall come into the world to sin, to suffer, to die, because of his few moments of pleasure, what cares he?

He says he is ready to provide for his children, therefore he feels himself a kind father, worthy of honor and love. That is, he is ready to provide for them food and clothing, but he is not willing to provide for them, by his self-denial, sound bodies, good tempers and a happy ante-natal existence. He gives his wife wealthy, leisure and luxury, and is, therefore, a devoted husband, and she is an undutiful, unloving wife, if her feelings fail to respond to his.

Devoted husband! Devoted to what? to self-gratification at the expense of the respect of his wife. I know men who call themselves Christians, who would insist that they are gentlemen, who never insult any woman — but their wives. They think it impossible that they can outrage them; they never think that even in wedlock there may be the very vilest prostitution; and if Christian women are prostitutes to Christian husbands, what can we expect but the natural sequence — infanticide?

Women who are in the last stages of consumption, who know that their offspring must be puny, suffering, neglected orphans, are still compelled to submit to maternity, and dying in childbirth, are their husbands ever condemned? Oh, no! It was only his right as a husband he claimed, and if maternity or death ensured, surely he could not be blamed for that. He did no desire it. The usual tenor of men’s conduct in this respect seems on par with that of Henry VIII, who when asked if the life of his wife or his child should be saved, as it seemed needful that one should be sacrificed, answered, “O the child, by all means. Wives are easily obtained.”

Women whose husbands are habitual drunkards and whose children are therefore idiotic, deformed creatures, and who feel assured that such must be the case with all their offspring, must yet submit. And if such a woman as the dying consumptive, rather than bring into the world such miserable children, rather perhaps than give life to a daughter to suffer all that she has endured, destroy the little being, as she thinks, before it lives, she would be punished by the law, and he, the real murderer, would go unrebuked, uncondemned.

All articles on this subject that I have read have been from men. They denounce women as alone guilty, and never include man in any plans proposed for the remedy of the evil.

It is clear to my mind that the evil wholly arises from the false position which woman occupies in civilized society. We know that in the brute creation, the female chooses her own time, and we are told that mind Indians the woman does not permit the approach of the man during pregnancy or lactation; yet what christian [sic] woman, wife of a christian [sic] husband, is free to consult her own feelings, even in this most delicate situations?

Guilty? Yes, no matter what the motive, love of ease, or desire to safe from suffering the unborn innocent, the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed. It will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; but oh! thrice guilty is he who, for selfish gratification, heedless of her prayers, indifferent to her fate, drive her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime. It is very fine to say:

My Author and Disposer, what thou willst

Unquestioned I obey — Thus God ordains.

God is thy law, thou mine.

But God has never given woman’s individuality into the hands of men. If He has, why hold her responsible for this crime? If man takes her individuality, he must also take her responsibility. Let him suffer.

No, I say, yield to woman her God-given right of individuality. Make her feel that to God alone is she responsible for her deeds; teach her that submission to any man without love and desire is prostitution; and thunder in her ear “Who so defileth the body, defileth the temple of the Holy Ghost!” let maternity  come to her from a desire to cherish love and train for high purpose an immortal soul, then you will have begun to eradicate this most monstrous crime.

Teach man to respect womanhood whether in the person of his own wife or the wife of another; teach him that as often as he outrages his wife he outrages Nature and disobeys the Divine Law, then you will have accomplished still more.

Oh, there is a dreadful volume of heart-histories that lie hidden in almost every family in the land! It tells of trust betrayed, of purity violated under sanction of law, of every holy feeling outraged and purest love turned to fear and loathing. If the moral feeling in the heart of woman was not stronger than death itself, the crimes we now chronicle against them would be virtues compared with the depths of wickedness and sin into which they would be driven. But God is stronger than man and he holds us true to our higher natures, martyrs though we be. If, on the other hand, women were not so weak and disgracefully submissive, they would rise to the dignity of womanhood and, throwing off the degrading touch, would say, “I am free. And to God alone I will unquestioningly yield myself.”

I believe all that is needed is for the eyes of men to be opened to the true state of affairs. They have received without a though the faith of their fathers. The misery and degradation have not been personally felt by them. But let every wife dare to be honest, let her open her heart freely to her husband, and I know there are few whose better natures would not be touched, few who would not be awakened to the nobler life, to a more exalted view of marriage.

then would marriage assume its high and holy place, Then would our children be truly olive plants, types of peace, loving ly desired, tenderly cared for, body and sour. Then the wife, looking with love and respect upon the husband, who as never caused her to fear his manhood, could say: “I am thine, and these are they whom Goad at our desire has given us.”

— A.